Police Searched This New York Home Again and Again — Then a Staircase Revealed the Missing Girl

For more than two years, Paisley Shultis was officially a missing child.

Her photograph circulated across New York. Investigators followed leads. Police repeatedly returned to the same Saugerties property. Her family insisted they did not know where she was.

And yet the answer was inside that house.

In February 2022, a detective examining a wooden staircase noticed something that did not look quite right. What appeared to be an ordinary part of the home concealed a small space behind it.

Inside was Paisley.

She was six years old and had been missing since she was four.

The discovery ended a two-and-a-half-year search and raised difficult questions about child custody, missing-person investigations, law enforcement procedures and child welfare.

It also became one of the most unusual missing-child recoveries in New York in recent years.

The child who disappeared after a custody dispute

Paisley Joann Shultis was four years old when she disappeared in July 2019.

Her parents, Kimberly Cooper and Kirk Shultis Jr., had lost custody of Paisley and her older sister after a New York family court proceeding. The children were placed under the care of their maternal grandmother.

On July 13, 2019, the grandmother went to collect the older child from school with assistance from a social worker and police.

The older girl was safely retrieved.

Then authorities went to collect Paisley.

She was gone.

The biological parents told investigators that Paisley had been taken out of state. Philadelphia was among the locations mentioned during the early investigation.

But investigators developed another theory.

They believed Paisley could still be somewhere in New York.

Their attention eventually focused on a house at 35 Fawn Road in Saugerties, where Paisley’s paternal grandfather, Kirk Shultis Sr., lived.

That address would remain connected to the investigation for years.

Why the case became so difficult to solve

Missing-child investigations can become especially complicated when custody disputes are involved.

Police cannot simply enter a private residence because someone claims a missing person may be inside. Under the Fourth Amendment, searches of homes generally require consent, a warrant, or another recognized legal basis.

Investigators need sufficient evidence to establish probable cause before a judge can issue a search warrant.

That distinction became crucial in Paisley’s case.

Saugerties police repeatedly received information pointing toward the Fawn Road property. Officers visited the home multiple times. According to Police Chief Joseph Sinagra, investigators went there nearly a dozen times during the investigation.

But they did not have the legal authority to conduct the kind of unrestricted search that ultimately found Paisley.

Some areas of the house were inaccessible to them during earlier visits.

The situation illustrates one of the most difficult tensions in law enforcement and child protection: investigators may strongly suspect that a vulnerable person is inside a home, while still being legally restricted from conducting a complete search.

The family continued to deny knowing where Paisley was

Investigators were repeatedly told that Paisley had not been seen since 2019.

The family maintained that position even as police continued following leads involving the Saugerties address.

The case did not simply disappear from the police department's attention.

Detectives continued working on it.

And the address continued to matter.

What investigators did not know at the time was that Paisley was apparently much closer than they had been told.

She was not hundreds of miles away.

She was not in another state.

She was inside the home they had already visited.

The tip that finally changed the investigation

After more than two years, investigators received another tip.

This time, the information was detailed enough to give police a stronger basis for action.

The investigation moved forward.

Authorities obtained a search warrant and prepared to return to 35 Fawn Road.

On February 14, 2022, members of the Saugerties Police Department, along with New York State Police investigators and uniformed troopers, entered the property.

They began searching.

This time, they were not limited in the same way as during earlier visits.

And eventually, investigators reached the basement.

The basement was accessible by a wooden staircase.

The staircase had been there during previous visits.

But Detective Eric Thiele noticed something that bothered him.

He could not immediately explain what seemed unusual.

He simply knew something was worth another look.

That instinct changed the case.

---

The moment investigators looked behind the staircase

Police Chief Sinagra later described Thiele as being unable to put his finger on exactly what seemed wrong.

The detective examined the staircase more closely.

He looked into a gap near one of the steps.

There appeared to be fabric.

Investigators began examining the structure.

They eventually used a Halligan tool to remove portions of the wooden staircase.

Behind the boards was a concealed space.

And inside were two people.

Paisley Shultis and her mother.

Paisley was alive.

She had been missing for more than two years.

The little girl investigators had been searching for since 2019 had been inside the house all along.

A hidden space had become part of the child's life

The concealed area contained blankets, pillows and clothing.

Police described the space as small and unsuitable for a child to live in.

The discovery was extraordinary not simply because of where Paisley was found, but because of how long she had apparently remained hidden.

She had disappeared at four.

She was six when investigators found her.

During those years, she had been absent from school and largely isolated from ordinary childhood life.

Police said she had not received formal schooling during the period she was missing.

She had also not received routine medical care.

For investigators and child-welfare professionals, the case therefore became more than a missing-person investigation.

It became a case involving education, healthcare, custody enforcement and the long-term welfare of a child.

Paisley had missed years of school

Perhaps one of the most consequential discoveries was what the missing years meant educationally.

Paisley was four when she disappeared.

She was six when she was found.

Those are formative years in a child's education.

Children normally begin learning basic reading, writing, mathematics and classroom routines during this period.

Paisley had missed that experience.

According to police, she could not read or write when she was recovered.

The consequences were therefore not limited to the two-and-a-half-year period in which she was physically hidden.

She also had to begin rebuilding the ordinary routines of childhood.

That meant returning to education, receiving medical attention and reconnecting with family members who had spent years looking for her.

The reunion was only the beginning

Paisley was reunited with her grandmother and older sister.

Her physical condition was described as generally good, which provided an important measure of relief after such a long disappearance.

But finding a missing child does not automatically erase the effects of years spent outside normal social and educational environments.

For Paisley, the recovery represented the beginning of another chapter.

She had to adjust to a world that had continued moving while she was hidden from it.

There would be school.

Doctors.

Family relationships.

New routines.

And questions about the years she had lost.

What police said about the custody decision

Police Chief Sinagra later made a broader point about the circumstances surrounding the case.

The original custody order had been issued because authorities believed the children should be removed from their parents' care.

The parents' decision to keep Paisley rather than comply with the court order created a much more serious situation.

Sinagra argued that the parents could potentially have worked through the legal system to address whatever circumstances had led to the custody decision.

Instead, the family chose to keep Paisley hidden.

That decision ultimately prolonged the separation and created new legal problems.

The case therefore became a powerful example of how family court orders and child custody disputes can have consequences far beyond the courtroom when one side refuses to comply.

Three adults were arrested

Three people were arrested in connection with Paisley's disappearance.

Her mother, Kimberly Cooper, was charged with second-degree custodial interference and endangering the welfare of a child.

Kirk Shultis Jr., Paisley's father, was charged with first-degree custodial interference and endangering the welfare of a child.

Kirk Shultis Sr., Paisley's grandfather and the owner of the Saugerties property, faced the same felony custodial-interference charge and misdemeanor child-endangerment charge as his son.

All three initially pleaded not guilty.

The arrests did not, however, end the legal story.

The criminal cases continued through the New York court system, producing additional developments over the following years.

The defense offered a different explanation

Attorneys representing the adults involved disputed aspects of the prosecution's characterization of events.

Lawyers argued that the parents loved their children and that the family's circumstances had been misunderstood.

The defense also challenged descriptions of the concealed space and questioned the way some aspects of the case had been portrayed publicly.

Those arguments are important because criminal allegations and factual findings are not the same thing.

A person charged with a crime is entitled to due process and is presumed innocent unless proven guilty or otherwise adjudicated.

At the same time, the underlying circumstances surrounding Paisley's disappearance and recovery were documented by investigators and became part of the public record.

Why police could not simply search the house years earlier

One of the most misunderstood parts of the case concerns the limits placed on police officers during their earlier visits.

It can seem obvious in hindsight that investigators should have dismantled the staircase immediately.

But hindsight changes the picture.

Before police obtained the later search warrant, investigators had to operate within constitutional limits.

The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures.

In practical terms, that means officers generally cannot conduct an unrestricted search of a private home simply because they have suspicions.

A tip may be important.

A suspicion may be strong.

An investigator's instincts may be excellent.

But a search warrant requires a legal showing of probable cause.

That system protects individual privacy and limits government power.

The difficulty is that the same protections can sometimes slow investigators when a missing or endangered person may be concealed inside a private residence.

Paisley's case demonstrates that tension with unusual clarity.

One detective decided to look again

The eventual discovery depended on a combination of circumstances.

A new tip provided investigators with the information needed to obtain a search warrant.

The warrant allowed police to conduct a more thorough search.

And Detective Thiele noticed something unusual about the staircase.

Each element mattered.

Without the tip, the warrant may not have been obtained at that moment.

Without the warrant, investigators would not have had the same authority to search.

Without Thiele's decision to examine the staircase more carefully, the concealed space might have remained unnoticed.

The case therefore became a reminder of how investigative persistence can matter even after months or years of apparent dead ends.

What happened to the adults afterward

The legal cases involving the adults continued after Paisley's recovery.

In July 2023, Cooper's attorney announced that the charges against her had been adjourned in contemplation of dismissal, meaning the case could be dismissed if she complied with the terms of the agreement and stayed out of trouble for the specified period.

Her attorney also said custody of Paisley had been returned to her mother.

Kirk Shultis Jr. later faced additional legal trouble.

In December 2022, he was arrested on a criminal-impersonation charge after allegedly providing a false name during a traffic stop.

In April 2024, he pleaded guilty to second-degree burglary in an unrelated case involving a Saugerties home.

The custodial-interference and child-endangerment proceedings connected to Paisley's disappearance formed part of the broader legal history surrounding the family.

Because court cases can develop over time, the precise status of individual charges should be distinguished from the established facts of the child's recovery.

The part of the story that still raises questions

Paisley's rescue answered the most important question.

Where was she?

She was inside the Saugerties home.

But the case left other questions unanswered.

How could a missing child remain inside a known location for so long?

How could repeated police visits fail to uncover her?

How should law enforcement balance constitutional protections for private homes with the urgent need to locate a missing child?

And what happens to a child who loses years of education and ordinary social development because adults refuse to comply with a custody order?

There are no simple answers.

The case sits at the intersection of child welfare, family law, constitutional rights and criminal investigation.

That is part of what makes it so unusual.

The Saugerties community was stunned

Saugerties is a small Hudson Valley community with a long history.

The Shultis surname itself had local roots extending back generations.

Residents interviewed after Paisley's discovery expressed shock that such an extraordinary situation had apparently been unfolding in a familiar neighborhood.

The contrast was difficult to ignore.

A community known for its quiet streets and historic character had become the setting for a missing-child investigation that attracted national attention.

And the house at the center of the case looked, from the outside, like an ordinary home.

That was part of the reason the discovery was so startling.

The truth was not necessarily far away.

It was concealed behind something people had been walking past.

The staircase became the symbol of the entire case

There are many details in the Paisley Shultis investigation that could have become the defining image of the story.

The missing-person posters.

The custody dispute.

The repeated police visits.

The search warrant.

The arrests.

But the staircase remains the most striking symbol.

It looked ordinary.

Investigators had encountered it before.

Yet behind it was a concealed space that had helped keep a missing child out of sight for years.

Detective Thiele's decision to stop and investigate what seemed slightly unusual transformed an apparently routine search into a child-recovery operation.

That is the part of the story that is easiest to understand.

Sometimes an investigation changes because someone decides that something ordinary deserves another look.

A missing-child case that became a lesson in persistence

Paisley Shultis was missing for more than two years.

During that time, her family situation became increasingly complicated, investigators continued following leads, and a private home became the center of an investigation that could not be resolved without sufficient legal authority.

Then came the tip.

Then the warrant.

Then the search.

Then the staircase.

And finally, Paisley was found alive.

Her recovery did not erase the years she had spent away from school, healthcare and normal childhood routines.

But it gave her something the investigation had been trying to provide since 2019: the opportunity to be found, protected and given a chance to move forward.

The case remains a remarkable example of the complexities surrounding missing children, child custody enforcement and law enforcement investigations.

It also carries a simpler lesson.

The answer is not always somewhere distant.

Sometimes it is much closer than anyone realizes.

Sometimes the difference between another unanswered night and a breakthrough is one investigator deciding to look at something one more time.

In Paisley Shultis's case, that something was a staircase.

And behind it was the child everyone had been searching for.